Editorial on Obama and religious freedom
The first public reactions to U.S. President Barack Obama’s
soul-stirring “Address to the People of India” at the Siri Fort
Auditorium in New Delhi before winding up his three-day historic trip to
the country on January 27 have, rather predictably, displayed a binary
logic. A good section instantly saw in Mr. Obama’s candid views on
“dealing with diversity of beliefs and of faiths” and the need to uphold
the constitutionally guaranteed ‘Right to Freedom of Religion’ without
fear of persecution or discrimination, a well-meant yet stinging
reminder to the Narendra Modi-led BJP Government to rein in its
religious fundamentalist elements. But an equally vocal section seemed
to resent his homily to a nation whose “Sanatana Dharma has been
extremely tolerant” of all religions. However, holistically there is
more substance to Mr. Obama’s 34-minute speech, set in the context of
two emerging scenarios. First, the possibility that America can be
“India’s best partner” in a whole range of activities including the
‘next wave’ of economic growth,
and second, at a more personal level how India for Mr. Obama represents
“an intersection of two men who have always inspired me” — Martin
Luther King Jr. and Mahatma Gandhi — in striving for equity and peace in
a non-violent way.
![]() |
Editorial on Obama and religious freedom |
It is from this
perceptual bedrock that the American President has sought to re-engage
India on a much wider socio-political canvas of cultural pluralism and
religious diversity under an overarching universal humanism. Mr. Obama’s
admission that “in our lives, Michelle and I have been strengthened by
our Christian faith”, may at best elevate traditional religious notions
like ‘God’ and ‘all of humanity being God’s children’, to a secular
plane in a complex, interdependent world in guarding against sectarian
divisions and dark violence which threaten to rapidly undermine
‘foundational human values’. This universalism for Mr. Obama, looking
beyond “any difference in religion or tribe and rejoice in the beauty of
every soul,” seem to be first premises for articulating a new global
ethic of peace and harmony. The entry point may be Hinduism,
Christianity, Islam or any other faith, but the goal is enabling
‘compassion and empathy’ in human affairs. This is a utopian task, but
this is what ‘world leaders’ like India and the U.S. should be doing, he
hinted. The late Philosopher-President Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan, in his
work, The Spirit of Religion said: “The world has got together
as a body; it is groping for its soul… If we can have a United Nations
Organization, cannot we have a United Religions Organization?” Mr.
Obama’s plea for religious freedom aims to give that vision a chance
under very different circumstances.